MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411396939 · doi:10.53762/wqh6kb75

10.53762/wqh6kb75

2000· article· en· W4411396939 on OpenAlex
Zainab Sadiq, Sardar Ali, Abdul Saboor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDutyIgnoranceLawIslamSociologyInstitutionPolitical sciencePhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marriage is the basic unit of a human society. It is a social institution in which a male and a female both are bound to live together while having their own domains of rights and responsibilities. According to Islam “Marriage” is a religious duty, a moral safeguard and a social commitment .Married life cannot be considered without conflicts and these conflicts can differ according to nature and intensity of the issues. Sometimes the main reason behind these disputes are just the ignorance and negligence from the provisions of marriage contract .So if these rules are provisions are known and applied, then family system is upright and its structure remains coherent. Likewise was the house of Prophet Muhammad PBUH. He was best among the human being and was innocent but His wives were not among the angels. So if some dispute occurred he was used to resolve it from his God gifted wisdom and understanding. In this article some of his Prophetic ways and techniques are discussed to resolve the domestic conflicts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9940.971

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it