MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411397007 · doi:10.53762/vkn3z306

10.53762/vkn3z306

2000· article· en· W4411397007 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Sharif, Masood Ahmed Mujahid

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComprehensionObject (grammar)Reading (process)PhilosophyLinguisticsLiteratureEpistemologyPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Holy Quran is known for its Grammatical knowledge but this aspect is often ignored or neglected. This article is an attempt to highlight this aspect. The maim object of this article is serving the holy Quran and subsiding the minded person to know the preponderant race of the verse under discussion, so in this article is being given examples from (Al-Muharrar al-Wajīz, Ibn Atiia and Al-Dur al-Masoon, Al-Sameen al-Halbi). This attempt will help the serious reader of the Holy Quran to have a deeper and fuller comprehension and appreciation of the meanings of the Holy Quran. A study of the grammatical problems makes the reading of the Holy Quran a more fascinating and beneficent experience. It also helps to catch a glimpse of the broader spectrum and profundity of the Quranic teachings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9920.976

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicHistorical and Linguistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207