MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411397460 · doi:10.53762/f188wf65

10.53762/f188wf65

2000· article· en· W4411397460 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Jan

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Women's Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamLawPolitical scienceSociologyTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before the emergence of Islam women was considered inferior and was given a lower status, but Islam has furnished them with moral, social and family rights. Unfortunately, with the passage of time, they are depriving from their basic rights. Violence is the major problem of all societies of the world. East and west both have been impacted through it. Now civilized societies are trying to stop violence against women, for it they are making laws. But still laws regarding women rights have not been implemented. In this research article it has been tried to find out causes of violence against women, main kinds of violation and its remedies in the light of teaching of Islam and contemporary laws have been discussed in a scholarly manner. This article consists of:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9870.985

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicGender and Women's RightsFrench-language works237,207