MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411399639 · doi:10.2196/68522

Effectiveness of Participatory Ergonomic Interventions on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Sick Absenteeism, and Work Performance Among Nurses: Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4411399639 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guganesan Krishnanmoorthy, Sanjay Rampal, Sumitra Ropini Karuthan, Faiz Baharudin, Rama Krishna Supramaniam

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Human Factors · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionAbsenteeismMedicineSystematic reviewScopusHuman factors and ergonomicsParticipatory ergonomicsScale (ratio)Physical therapyMEDLINENursingPsychologyPoison controlEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Nurses face a higher risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) due to their primary roles in patient care. Participatory ergonomics (PE), an approach that integrates large-scale interventions performed at organizational and systems levels with small-scale interventions, is widely considered a promising approach to mitigate health problems at the workplace. However, its effectiveness in addressing WMSDs and secondary outcomes such as sickness absence and work performance among nurses is not fully understood. Objective: This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of PE interventions in preventing WMSDs and mitigating two related outcomes, sickness absence and work performance, among nurses. Methods: A literature search was performed in four electronic databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and PsycNet, guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines to retrieve relevant papers published between 2017 and 2023. Papers fulfilling the eligibility criteria were analyzed and subjected to quality appraisal. Results: Overall, 19 papers were included in the final analysis. Various categories of ergonomic interventions were identified, with the predominant being exercise and physical activities, health promotional activities and training, educational programs, and patient handling devices. Multicomponent interventions, especially those involving physical activities and exercise, demonstrated stronger effects in reducing the risk of WMSDs at 6 months (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.12-4.54) and 12 months postintervention (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.52-4.51) compared with single interventions. However, most ergonomic interventions had no statistically significant effect (P>.05) on sickness absence and work performance. More than half (n=13) of the studies demonstrated moderate to high risk of bias, reflecting the need for better quality interventions. Conclusions: Multicomponent interventions, particularly those involving physical activities and exercise, are more effective in reducing the risk of WMSDs among nurses compared with individual interventions. However, their long-term effects in addressing WMSDs, sick absenteeism, and work performance are still unclear. These gaps could be addressed by integrating organizational factors and prevention policies into existing ergonomic interventions, thereby offering opportunities to improve psychological health, job satisfaction, and work dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Human FactorsSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207