Refining pseudo-labels through iterative mix-up for weakly supervised semantic segmentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) aims to provide accurate pixel-level annotation based on only weak guidance, primarily derived from image-level labels. Recent WSSS methods exploit pseudo-labels generated from improved class activation maps (CAMs) to train a fine-grained classification model for semantic segmentation. However, these pseudo-labels are unreliable because they tend to either miss parts of the objects or include irrelevant regions due to weak guidance from individual images. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective iterative mix-up strategy, Pseudo-Label-based Mix (PL-Mix), that refines pseudo-labels iteratively, thereby further enhancing WSSS performance. During each iteration, we migrate object regions from pseudo-labels produced in previous steps and render them with new contexts in a mix-up fashion. Due to model consistency enforcement across varied backgrounds and new combinations of multiple objects from enriched image samples, these pseudo-labels progressively become more accurate and reliable. Further enhanced by a masking strategy and a CAM-based earth mover’s distance loss, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on the PASCAL VOC2012 and MS COCO2014 benchmark datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it