MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411402404 · doi:10.3934/era.2025171

Robust-observer design for nonlinear systems with delayed measurements using time-averaged Lyapunov stability criterion

2025· article· en· W4411402404 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Research Archive · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemObserver (physics)Lyapunov functionStability (learning theory)MathematicsLyapunov redesignCircle criterionComputer scienceExponential stabilityPhysicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper developed an observer design for a matrix-Lipchitz nonlinear system with measurement delay that can achieve a desired $ {\mathcal{L}}_{2} $ performance in the presence of modeling uncertainties, input disturbance, and measurement noise. The observer was shown to be stable in the absence of disturbances and modeling uncertainties. The equations for the observer design were shown to be both necessary and sufficient. Furthermore, the observer design was formulated as linear matrix inequality (LMI) that can be solved offline using commercial solvers. Compared to previous literature, the proposed observer does not require the underlying system to be stable. The observer design procedure is demonstrated through two illustrative examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it