MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411404032 · doi:10.1016/j.clet.2025.101027

Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of hemp utilization for biocomposite pellet production: A case study with data quality assurance process

2025· article· en· W4411404032 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCleaner Engineering and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMitacs
KeywordsBiocompositePelletQuality assuranceLife-cycle assessmentProcess (computing)Production (economics)Production cycleQuality (philosophy)Process engineeringEnvironmental scienceManufacturing engineeringBusinessEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceOperations managementComposite materialExternal quality assessment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural fiber biomass pre-processing practices, including collection and particle size reduction, are crucial for sustainable manufacturing. This industrial case study evaluates the environmental impact of producing a fully hemp-derived biopolymer/lignin biocomposite pellet using different biomass collection and pre-processing equipment configurations, in order to identify the most efficient and eco-friendly operational option. The system boundary follows cradle-to-gate approach, covering upstream activities such as cultivation, harvesting, size reduction, transportation, and pellet manufacturing. To this end, an attributional Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is performed using a functional unit of 1 tonne of biocomposite, comparing four supply chain (SC) design alternatives involving different baler (round/square) and size reduction equipment (full/half screen hammer mill) options. We specifically delve into the relative difference of the full-screen hammer mill and square baler (as a best-case/reference) with the half-screen hammer mill and round baler (as a worst-case). Results indicated that the half-round alternative exhibited 30-44% higher environmental impacts due to 30% higher harvested biomass and 9% higher diesel usage per tonne of produced biocomposite, but resulted in higher product quality compared to the full-square alternative. The harvesting stage, linked to the use of biomass, fertilizers, and diesel fuels, is identified as a critical contributor to the environmental impact in all the important impact categories. Sensitivity analysis revealed that a 10-30% increase in biomass yield could reduce impacts across all categories by approximately 7-20%. A scenario-based improvement model integrating substitution of nitrogen fertilizer with compost, diesel-to-natural gas switching, ethanol recycling, and increased hemp yield demonstrated up to 85% GWP reduction compared to the baseline. The improved biocomposite scenario achieved 57% lower GWP and 43% lower smog formation than virgin PET, also outperforming it in fossil fuel depletion. These findings support the viability of hemp-based biocomposites under improved conditions and emphasize the importance of operational SC decisions for sustainable material development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it