Intelligent ensemble architecture for capturing transient nitrogen oxides emission spikes in real-world driving conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate prediction and monitoring of tailpipe nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions is crucial for the design of effective automotive emission control strategies and for air quality in urban climates . This paper introduces a deep-learning soft sensing methodology designed to estimate tailpipe NOx emissions with high accuracy. The proposed method can capture both fast and slow transient behaviors of emissions, leading to accurate predictions of high spikes and smaller fluctuations. The central aspect of the proposed methodology is a temporal convolutional network (TCN) based classifier that differentiates between high and low NOx values. This differentiation allows the method to select the appropriate prediction model, specifically a TCN-based multi-head self-attention neural network . A hybrid methodology combining physics-based and data-driven approaches is employed for input feature selection, enhancing model robustness. The proposed method has been validated using an extensive dataset ( 2300km) of field data from the City of Edmonton, Canada transit buses. Comparative analysis with other prediction models, including deep neural networks (DNN), long-short-term memory networks (LSTM), TCN, and state-of-the-art TCNs with multi-head self-attention, demonstrate the advantage of the proposed approach. Notable improvements in capturing both high and low NOx transient dynamics compared to a DNN model are achieved. Specifically, the proposed model achieves a 78% improvement in mean absolute error (MAE) for high NOx values (from 21.77 to 4.67 [milligrams per second (mg/s)]) and a 59% improvement (from 0.72 to 0.29 [mg/s]) for low NOx values compared to the DNN models. For mean square error (MSE), the improvements are 89% (from 521.85 to 54.39 [mg/s] ) for high NOx values and 33% (from 1.47 to 0.98 [mg/s] ) for low NOx values compared to those in the DNN models. In terms of root mean square error (RMSE), the proposed method shows a 67% (from 22.85 to 7.37 [mg/s]) improvement for high NOx values and a 32% (from 1.31 to 0.89[mg/s]) improvement for low NOx values compared to DNN models. Finally, a comparative analysis was conducted against other state-of-the-art predictive models, including LSTM and TCN, and the results show that the proposed method consistently outperforms these models. This superiority was validated through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".