MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411404983 · doi:10.1017/9781009158688.010

Spatial Diversity Analysis

2025· book-chapter· en· W4411404983 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSpatial and Panel Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)GeographyAntenna diversityComputer scienceSociologyAnthropologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial structure is key to understanding diversity in ecological systems, being affected by both location and scale. The effects of scale are often dealt with as the hierarchy of alpha (local area), beta (between areas) and gamma (largest areas) diversity. All have spatial aspects, but beta diversity may be most interesting for spatial analysis because it involves complex responses such as intermediate-scale nestedness and species turnover with or without environmental gradients. In addition to species diversity within communities, the diversity of species composition or combinations as a function of location is an important characteristic of ecological assemblages. Many aspects of spatial diversity are best understood by spatial graphs, with sites as nodes and edges quantifying inter-site relationships. Temporal information, when available, can provide crucial insights about spatial diversity through understanding the dynamics of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it