MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411408181 · doi:10.2337/ds24-0090

Adherence to Type 1 Diabetes Care Visits After Transfer From Pediatric to Adult Care: A Prospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4411408181 on OpenAlex
Simon Lafontaine, Élise Mok, Jennifer Frei, Kaberi Dasgupta, Elham Rahme, Marc Dorais, Lorraine Bell, Meranda Nakhla

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Spectrum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersDiabetes Canada
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusYoung adultAdult careType 2 diabetesProspective cohort studyOdds ratioLogistic regressionCohort studyHealth careOddsPediatricsFamily medicineGerontologyInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to describe health care utilization by adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes after transfer from pediatric to adult care and to determine predictors of nonadherence to diabetes care visits after this transition. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study following adolescents with type 1 diabetes for 18 months after their last pediatric visit from 2017 to 2021. We assessed health care utilization using Quebec health administrative data. The primary exposure was delay in establishing adult diabetes care, defined as a delay of >6 months between the last pediatric and the first adult diabetes care visit. Secondary exposures were self-reported self-efficacy, transition readiness, and diabetes distress before transferring to adult care. The primary outcome was nonadherence, defined as having gap(s) of >6 months between adult diabetes care visits. Secondary outcomes were one or more diabetes-related emergency department (ED) visit and one or more diabetes-related hospitalization. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of nonadherence to diabetes care visits after transition to adult care. RESULTS: Fifteen of 74 participants (20%) had delays in establishing adult diabetes care. Twenty participants (27%) were nonadherent to adult diabetes care visits. Six participants (8.1%) had one or more ED visit, and one participant (1.4%) was hospitalized after transferring to adult care. Delay in establishing adult care was associated with subsequent nonadherence to adult diabetes care visits (adjusted odds ratio 29.9, 95% CI 5.3-169.9). CONCLUSION: Health care utilization after transfer to adult care is suboptimal in young adults with type 1 diabetes. Delayed transfer of care puts young adults at risk of disengaging from adult diabetes care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it