MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411412401 · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2025.05.014

TBX3 advances the developmental chromatin landscape toward the hepatic fate

2025· article· en· W4411412401 on OpenAlexafffund
Tabea L. Stephan, Rebecca Cullum, Sibyl Drissler, Ashleigh Thomas, Bettina M. Fuglerud, Makenna Clement-Ranney, Jeremy Lotto, Nicole A. J. Krentz, Stephen A. Duncan, Pamela A. Hoodless

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Cell · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTerry Fox Research Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNorges ForskningsrådGenome British Columbia
KeywordsBiologyChromatinEvolutionary biologyCell biologyComputational biologyEcologyGeneticsDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By mapping histone modifications in a human stem cell model of hepatic differentiation, we identified an enhancer landscape that is dynamic and stage specific, with many primed at the definitive endoderm stage. While hepatic enhancers gained active histone modifications, non-hepatic enhancers lost H3K4me1 after hepatic specification. T-box transcription factor 3 (TBX3) was found to bind to hepatic enhancers and promoters. TBX3 binding was transient, and only upon the dissociation of TBX3 from its bound regions were active histone modifications acquired. Subsequently, transcription was activated, supporting a role for TBX3 in directly activating the hepatic lineage. Constitutive overexpression of TBX3 indicated that dissociation of TBX3 is crucial for gene activation. TBX3 did not bind to any pancreatic regulatory regions directly, indicating indirect repression of the pancreatic lineage. Together, this suggests that TBX3 plays a role in identifying and bookmarking hepatic enhancers and promoters during specification, which subsequently will be activated to drive cell identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental CellSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207