MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411412859 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004712

Effectiveness of barber-facilitated “Doing What Matters in Times of Stress” intervention among urban literate youths in Western Kenya: A cluster randomised trial

2025· article· en· W4411412859 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Protus Musotsi, Phiona Koyiet, Harriet Musimbi, Ken Simiyu, Elijah Chemorei, Peter Koskei, Stella Evangelidou, Mary Nangukhula

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Global Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGrand Challenges Canada
KeywordsMedicineIntervention (counseling)AnxietyMental healthPsychological interventionRandomized controlled trialCluster randomised controlled trialDepression (economics)DistressPsychiatryClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Youth with mental health disorders are a growing concern in Kenya, yet services are inaccessible. "Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM)" is a scalable self-help intervention that can be delivered by lay providers. However, its effectiveness in low-resource, non-humanitarian settings is unknown. We evaluated the effectiveness of barber-facilitated DWM intervention in reducing psychological distress, while improving functioning and resilience among literate urban youths in Western Kenya. This cluster randomised trial involved 15 barbers in intervention group and 15 in the waiting-list control. Barbers were from 30 barbershops in Bungoma and Kitale towns, aged 18-30 years and literate in English. Using mental health-themed music as an entry point, barbers recruited youth aged 18-29 years, fluent in English, and had mild or moderate psychological distress and functioning difficulties. Intervention participants received DWM guide and/or audios, supported by barbers through three individual sessions. Waiting-list control participants received the intervention after five weeks. Outcome measures included Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and psychological outcome profiles (PSYCHLOPS). We analysed data using cumulative ordinal multilevel models. Between 31st July 2023-27th January 2024, 330 eligible youths were enrolled (n = 158, from 11 intervention arm barbers and n = 172 from 10 control barbers). Post-intervention, intervention group youth had 95%, 82% and 71% lower odds of higher depression (AOR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.10, p < 0.001), anxiety (AOR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.34, p < 0.001) and stress (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.71, p = 0.007), respectively. They also had 86% lower odds of higher self-identified problem severity scores (AOR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.08 -0.27, p < 0.001) and 4.3 times higher odds of higher resilience levels (AOR = 4.33, 95% CI 2.00-9.36, p < 0.001). DWM effectively reduced psychological distress and improved resilience among youths. Barbershops are promising community places for mental health promotion. Long-term, multi-site studies are required to assess outcome sustainability and scalability. Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202306502042812.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS Global Public HealthSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207