Improving HIV Prevention Among Heterosexual Men Seeking Sexually Transmitted Infection Services in Malawi: Protocol for a Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Randomized Controlled Trial of Systems Navigator–Delivered Integrated Prevention Package (HPTN 112-NJIRA Study)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains one of the most efficacious interventions for preventing HIV, but its effectiveness is often limited by poor persistence. Although regional efforts have primarily focused on young women and men who have sex with men, heterosexual men in East and Southern Africa represent a crucial group to engage and retain in PrEP care-both to improve health outcomes for men and to interrupt HIV transmission chains. Men seeking sexually transmitted infection (STI) services are particularly vulnerable to HIV acquisition, yet only a few interventions have tested strategies for engaging and retaining these men in PrEP services. Systems navigation, which addresses barriers to health care access and enhances comfort in clinical settings, may offer a promising approach to improving persistent PrEP use among heterosexual men. OBJECTIVE: This study will assess the effect of a peer-delivered systems navigator-facilitated HIV prevention package on PrEP persistence at 26 weeks among heterosexual men seeking STI clinical services in Lilongwe, Malawi. It will also evaluate the acceptability of the intervention and barriers to implementation among key stakeholders. Insights will inform the feasibility of a future randomized controlled trial. METHODS: In this single-site pilot type I effectiveness-implementation hybrid randomized controlled trial, 200 heterosexual men seeking STI services and initiated on PrEP in Lilongwe, Malawi, will be randomized (1:2) to standard-of-care PrEP services or systems navigator-assisted PrEP care (intervention). Participants will be followed every 13 weeks for at least 26 and up to 52 weeks. PrEP use and engagement in care will be assessed through medical record review and intraerythrocytic tenofovir diphosphate measurement, using objective biomedical analyses via dried blood spot. Primary effectiveness and implementation outcomes include 26-week PrEP persistence (adapted to accommodate daily oral, event-driven oral, or injectable PrEP) and acceptability, respectively. Additional implementation outcomes include feasibility and cost. Exploratory objectives characterize preferences for PrEP modalities, perceived and experienced stigma, and the influence of gender norms on PrEP persistence. All clinical services, including the provision of PrEP and PrEP safety monitoring, are being conducted by the Malawi Ministry of Health. RESULTS: HPTN (HIV Prevention Trials Network) 112 was funded in November 2023. Study recruitment began in April 2024 and closed in November 2024. As of February 3, 2025, the study has enrolled 199 participants, with follow-up expected through June 2025. No interim analyses were planned; data analysis for primary end points is expected in the summer of 2025. CONCLUSIONS: Improving PrEP use outcomes among heterosexual men in East and Southern Africa is critical to interrupting HIV transmission. This study offers unique insights into a low-resource, potentially scalable intervention, focusing on a group of men at particularly high risk of HIV acquisition-those with recent STIs. The hybrid RCT design addresses clinically relevant effectiveness questions and explores key determinants that will inform future multisite implementation trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06200545; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06200545. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/72981.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.031 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".