MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411416350 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.775

POS0389 PREVALENCE OF HYPOPHOSPHATASIA IN RHEUMATOLOGY AND OSTEOPOROSIS CARE CLINICS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

2025· article· en· W4411416350 on OpenAlexaff
Valentin Sebastian Schäfer, K. Moss, C Tornero, Julia F. Charles, J. Adachi, Adam J. Singer, J. Hinman, G. Wegmann, Sheng Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypophosphatasiaRheumatologyOsteoporosisInternal medicineFamily medicinePediatricsAlkaline phosphatase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare, inherited metabolic disease caused by deficient tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, usually associated with ALPL variants and characterized by compromised bone mineralization, fractures/pseudofractures, muscle weakness, musculoskeletal pain, impaired mobility, early dental loss, and reduced quality of life. Because of its heterogeneous clinical presentation, HPP can be misdiagnosed as osteoporosis, fibromyalgia, or a form of arthritis, among other disorders. In addition, patients presenting with symptoms of both HPP and another of these diseases are often diagnosed with the more common condition. Findings from an increasing number of studies using screening algorithms to identify patients with HPP suggest that the disease may be more prevalent than previously recognized. Objectives: As part of a broader systematic review of the prevalence of HPP identified using screening algorithms in various clinical settings, we sought to describe the use of HPP screening algorithms, specifically in rheumatology and osteoporosis clinics, and to summarize the prevalence of HPP in these settings. Methods: A systematic review of full-length studies published between 2015 and 2024 was conducted using PubMed and search terms related to HPP, prevalence, ALP, and conditions, including rheumatology and osteoporosis. The search was restricted to articles in English. Data were extracted on study characteristics, number and percentage of individuals with persistently low ALP activity (generally ≥2–3 measures below normal), and number of patients identified with HPP. The prevalence of HPP in the study population, including individuals with persistently low ALP activity, is reported. Results: Of 331 publications identified, 59 met criteria for full-text review and 28 were analyzed for data extraction. Of the 28 publications, 3 reported studies in patients treated in a rheumatology setting and 2 in patients in an osteoporosis setting (Table 1). The remaining 23 studies were within settings other than rheumatology and osteoporosis and are not presented here. One additional study with full text in German and abstract in English was identified outside of the PubMed search and included given its relevance and study setting within a rheumatology department. Overall, the percentage of outpatients with persistently low ALP activity ranged from 0.38% (7/1839) to 1.22% (28/2289). In 2 studies in rheumatology outpatients, the prevalence of genetically confirmed HPP among those with persistently low ALP was 46.4% (13/28) and 56.5% (13/23). One study of patients with fibromyalgia and ALP activity below the upper limit of normal reported that 9.3% (57/611) had persistently low ALP, but this did not exclude known secondary causes of low ALP and there was no further evaluation to confirm HPP. Among rheumatology and internal medicine inpatients with persistently low ALP activity, 6.0% (11/182) were genetically confirmed to have HPP. Among patients seen at an osteoporosis clinic who had persistently low ALP, prevalence of genetically confirmed HPP was 57.1% (4/7). In another study in patients seen at a UK osteoporosis clinic, 87.5% (14/16) of those with persistently low ALP had potentially pathogenic ALPL variants, although specific signs and symptoms of HPP were not stated. Conclusion: The prevalence of HPP appears to be high in rheumatology and osteoporosis clinics among adults with persistently low ALP activity. Among adults with persistently low ALP in these settings, at least 46.4% to 57.1% had genetically confirmed HPP. These findings should be a call to action for practitioners in rheumatology and osteoporosis clinics to test for ALP and emphasize the importance of investigating low ALP activity, as HPP is highly prevalent among patients with persistently low ALP. REFERENCES: [1] Alonso N, et al. J Bone Miner Res 2020;35:657-661. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3928. [2] Feurstein J, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022;17:435. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02572-7. [3] García-Fontana C, et al. Sci Rep 2019;9:9569. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46004-2. [4] Injean P, et al. ACR Open Rheumatol 2023;5:524-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11591. [5] Karakostas P, et al. Z Rheumatol 2022;81:513-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-021-00994-5. [6] Kishnani PS, et al. Mol Genet Metab 2017;122:4-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.07.010. [7] Larid G, et al. RMD Open 2024;10:e004316. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004316. [8] Ng E, et al. Osteoporosis Int 2023;34:327-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06597-3. Table 1 . Acknowledgements: This study was sponsored by Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, MA, USA. Editorial support was provided by Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, and funded by Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease. Disclosure of Interests: Valentin S. Schäfer Valentin S. Schäfer has received lecture honoraria from AbbVie, Novartis, BMS, Chugai, Celgene, Medac, Sanofi, Lilly, Hexal, Pfizer, Janssen, Roche, Shire, Onkowissen, Royal College London, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB Fresenius, Alexion; consulting fees from Novartis, Chugai, AbbVie, Celgene, Sanofi, Lilly, Hexal, Pfizer, Amgen, BMS, Roche, Gilead, Medac, Boehringer Ingelheim, Alexion, Valentin S. Schäfer has received research support from Novartis, Hexal, Lilly, Roche, Celgene, University of Bonn, Boehringer Ingelheim, Butterfly IQ, MEDAC, Alexion, DGRH, and BMBF, Katie Moss Katie Moss has had advisory board participation/presentations from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Katie Moss has received educational grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Novartis, and UCB, Carolina Tornero Carolina Tornero has received consulting fees from Amgen and Alexion and honoraria from AbbVie, Theramex, UCB, Amgen, and Gedeon Richter, Carolina Tornero has received grant support from Alexion, Julia F. Charles Julia F. Charles has received honoraria from AbbVie, Alexion, Ultragenyx, Kyowa Kirin, and AbbVie, Julia F. Charles has received grant support from Novartis, Jonathan Adachi Jonathan D. Adachi has received payment/honoraria and consulting fees from Alexion, Amgen, and Sandoz, Jonathan D. Adachi has received grants from Amgen, Andrea J. Singer Andrea J. Singer has received honoraria Agnovos, Amgen, Astellas, Pfizer, Radius Health, and UCB, Andrea J. Singer has received consulting fees from Agnovos, Amgen, Astellas, Pfizer, Radius Health, and UCB, Jessica Hinman Jessica Hinman has received consulting fees from Alexion, Georgiana Wegmann Liliana-Georgiana Wegmann is an employee of and owns stock/options in Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Shona Fang Shona Fang is an employee of and owns stock/options in Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesSame topicAlkaline Phosphatase Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207