Parenting Stress in the Relationship between Positive Psychological Capital and Parental Burnout
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research seeks to explore the pathways through which parents' psychological capital affects parental burnout, emphasizing the intermediary function of parenting stress. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 461 parents from various provinces and cities across China. The instruments used included the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (α = 0.90), the Parenting Stress Scale (α = 0.89), and the Parental Burnout Inventory (α = 0.91). The results indicated that psychological capital was significantly negatively correlated with parental burnout (r = -0.459, p < 0.001) and parenting stress (r = -0.428, p < 0.001), while parenting stress was positively correlated with parental burnout (r = 0.555, p < 0.001). Mediation analysis using PROCESS Model 4 with bootstrapping revealed that parenting stress partially mediated the relationship between psychological capital and parental burnout, accounting for 40.96% of the total effect. These findings underscore the protective role of psychological resources in reducing parenting stress and preventing burnout among parents. The results also offer valuable insights for developing targeted psychological support interventions aimed at enhancing family well-being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".