MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411417963 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103255

Predicting Cardiovascular deterioration in a paediatric intensive care unit (PicEWS): a machine learning modelling study of routinely collected health-care data

2025· article· en· W4411417963 on OpenAlexaff
Dan F. Stein, Michael J. Carter, John Booth, Mark Peters, Samiran Ray, Neil J. Sebire, Payam Barnaghi, Mario Cortina‐Borja

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research CentreMedical Research CouncilGreat Ormond Street Hospital CharityUniversity College LondonGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenRoyal Academy of EngineeringEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUK Dementia Research InstituteNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchKing's College LondonUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care unitIntensive care medicineHealth careMedical emergencyEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Paediatric intensive care medicine uses fine granular clinical data that describe substantial patient instability to make high-consequence decisions. However, these decisions are also hindered by clinical experts' ability to interpret longitudinal data along with recent and gradual changes in the vital sign data. Machine learning aided decisions can improve the identification of patient deterioration. Important prior work has predicted outcomes in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but has often used non-time series data without age normalisation. Most current work also aims to predict mortality, not potentially treatable clinical inflection points such as cardiovascular deterioration. Methods: We extracted telemetry data, alongside laboratory and demographic data, from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of patients admitted to the general PICU at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London (UK), between 1st April 2019 and 31st April 2021. We engineered deterioration monitoring variables into a smaller feature set using a generalisable pipeline. We calculated trend and variability, and used validated age-normalisation for input variables where appropriate. We compared neural network models, gradient-boosted decision trees (XGBoost), and a logistic regression model to predict cardiovascular deterioration within 12 h (defined as a rise in the paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) cardiovascular sub-score, rising plasma lactate if lactate ≥2 mmol/l, new extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requirement, or death). We trained the models on a 70-15-15 percent train-test-validation split. We compared model compositions, including without trend, variability, and frequency of input to smaller models. We investigated feature importance using internal feature importance and Shapley Additive Explanation values. We compared the resulting paediatric intensive care early warning score (PicEWS) with the paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score as the gold-standard. Findings: 1167 patients were included out of a possible 1195. The best performing predictive model for PicEWS was XGBoost. PicEWS was able to predict cardiovascular deterioration 90% of the time, with fewer than two false alarms for every true alarm. For this model, the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) was 0.552, and area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) was 0.949. This outperformed pSOFA, which yielded over 10 false alarms per true alarm, with an AUPRC of 0.150 and AUROC of 0.715. The most important features for PicEWS included blood pressure, physiological markers such as bilirubin, and COMFORT score (a sedation and behavioural score used in paediatric intensive care). Feature variability was key to model performance. We demonstrated predictions on an individual patient to show model utility. The study showed that machine learning models can outperform current clinical best practice approaches. We use our model to provide insights into future improvements in clinical practice. Interpretation: PicEWS outperforms current clinical modelling approaches to predict cardiovascular deterioration. The proposed data processing pipeline and machine learning method offer a clinically applicable decision-support model using age-stratified normal ranges and feature variability over time for the early detection of clinical deterioration in critically ill children. Funding: The NIHR Great Ormond Street Biomedical Research Centre at UCL and the Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity peer-reviewed grant award.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207