MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411419497 · doi:10.1029/2024gl114583

Multidirectional Dune Dynamics Under Seasonal Winds on Mars

2025· article· en· W4411419497 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Chojnacki, D. A. Vaz, Pruthviraj J. Acharya, S. Silvestro, I. B. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAeolian processesGeologyGlobal wind patternsMars Exploration ProgramPrevailing windsAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyGeomorphologyOceanographyAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a systematic assessment of the complex aeolian bedforms across the western rim of Hellas Planitia, the largest impact basin on Mars. Repeat orbital imaging shows crescentic, transverse, and star dunes across the Hellespontus Montes region migrate, converge, and occasionally reverse course. Dune morphology and sand ripple migration identify three effective wind regimes that vary spatially and temporally, correlating with atmospheric modeling. Peak sand transport occurs during southern spring and summer to the west and southwest, driven by daytime anabatic slope winds originating from Hellas. Migration rates decline with waning temperatures, when eastward drainage winds into Hellas dominate nights annually and during the colder seasons. However, these diurnally and seasonally cyclic slope winds can be highly localized, as nearby barchan fields swiftly migrate exclusively west where eastward winds are mitigated by topography. These novel findings highlight the complexity of surface‐atmosphere interactions in shaping aeolian systems on Mars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207