MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411427447 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.1783

ABS1071 MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIFESTATIONS OF ENTEROPATHIC ARTHRITIS VARY IN RELATION TO INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE BEHAVIOUR, LOCALIZATION, AND EXTENT

2025· article· en· W4411427447 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian M. D’Onofrio, Vettor Giulia, Baleanu Maria Cristina, Angela Ceribelli, A. Armuzzi, C. Selmi

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseArthritisDiseaseInflammatory arthritisMusculoskeletal diseaseDermatologyImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) coexist in enteropathic arthritis (IBD-SpA), which is the less studied phenotype within the SpA spectrum. As such, despite fundamental advances are occurring across axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis, similar progress has not occurred within IBD-SpA and there is not an agreement on a clear recognition of clinical phenotypes (or domains). Conversely, CD and UC display different and well-defined characteristics with regard to disease phenotype, localization, and extent. At present, no data explore the possible musculoskeletal and extra-musculoskeletal differences of IBD-SpA according to IBD features. Objectives: The aims of the study were (1) to assess the demographic, clinical, and treatment differences between CD-SpA and UC-SpA, (2) to evaluate whether IBD features are associated with different SpA manifestations, (3) to compare CD-SpA patients with and without perianal involvement. Methods: We took advantage of the multidisciplinary SpA-IBD clinic within the ImmunoCenter of the Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, and identified patients with coexisting diagnoses of SpA and IBD who were consecutively seen between March 2022 and March 2024. Patients with SpA were included if fulfilling the ASAS classification criteria for axial or peripheral SpA, while the CD or UC diagnosis was based on ECCO criteria. Demographic and clinical data were collected at baseline and at the last available follow-up visit; also, IBD patterns (CD, UC), and localization, extent, and behaviour of the disease were evaluated according to the Montreal classification criteria. CD was as inflammatory (B1), stenosing (B2), fistulizing (B3), with a possible perianal disease associated, with regard the behaviour, and as ileal (L1), ileo-colic (L3), colonic (L2), and/or upper GI (L4) with regard the localization. Similarly, the extent of UC can be limited to the rectum (E1) or be spread to the left (E2) or the whole colon (E3). SpA was defined based on the presence of peripheral arthritis, axial arthritis, combined peripheral-plus-axial, enthesitis, dactylitis, psoriasis, uveitis, and erythema nodosum. Isolated axial involvement was defined by the absence or peripheral joint involvement at last follow-up visit, and vice versa. Multi-drug failure was defined in patients who failed more than 2 b- or ts-DMARDs with different mechanisms of action. Results: We analysed 66 patients with IBD-SpA, the largest part (n=40) with CD and the remaining (n=26) with UC; no differences were observed between the two subgroups except for a higher frequency of psoriasis within the former [19 (47%) in CD vs. 6 (23) in UC; p=0.046] (Table 1). Among UC cases, extensive colitis was more commonly associated with combined peripheral-axial involvement [8 (61%) for E3 vs. 0 (0%) for E1 and 2 (22%) for E2; p=0.016]. With respect to CD, the isolated axial involvement was more common in patients with stenosing phenotype involvement [7 (41%) for B2 vs. 3 (15%) for B1 and 2 (40%) for B3; p=0.042] and colonic disease [8 (44%) for 2 vs. 3 (9%) for L1 and 0 (0%) for L1; p=0.010], while dactylitis was more frequently observed in those with fistulizing phenotype [2 (40%) for B3 vs. 2 (10%) for B1 and 1 (6%) for B2; p=0.017] and ileo-colic localization [2 (33%) for L3 vs. 4 (19%) for L1 and 3 (17%) for L2; p=0.039]. We did not observe differences comparing CD patients with and without perianal involvement except for a more common association with uveitis within the former [3 (43%) for perianal disease vs. 1 (3%) for non-perianal disease; p=0.00]), apparently not driven by the HLA-B27 allele (p=ns). Conclusion: We investigated for the first time the association between musculoskeletal manifestations of SpA and behaviour, localization, and extent of IBD. The combined peripheral-plus-axial joint involvement was more commonly associated with extensive colitis within UC-SpA. On the other side, patients with CD-SpA had more commonly an isolated axial involvement, when presenting with an intestinal stenosing phenotype and a colonic localization, and dactylitis, when showing a fistulizing behaviour and an ileo-colic involvement. Furthermore, uveitis was more commonly detected in CD-SpA with perianal disease. Profiling patients according to IBD characteristics might be useful in designing studies and tailored trials for IBD-SpA. REFERENCES: NIL . Acknowledgements: NIL . Disclosure of Interests: None declared . © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Myopathies and DermatomyositisFrench-language works237,207