MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411429385 · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14060614

Interactions Between Iron Metabolism and the Endocannabinoid System in Bacterial Infections

2025· review· en· W4411429385 on OpenAlexaff
Kayle Dickson, Juan Zhou, Christine Lehmann

Bibliographic record

VenueAntibiotics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocannabinoid systemContext (archaeology)Iron homeostasisMicrobial metabolismHomeostasisMetabolismImmune systemBiologyBacteriaCell biologyBiochemistryImmunologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron is a key nutritional requirement for a variety of physiological functions, and its metabolism is tightly controlled under homeostatic conditions. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) represents an additional physiological system with a key role in maintaining homeostasis that is known for its role in modulating immune responses. Recent research has highlighted intriguing interactions between these systems, including the suppression of iron uptake by the ECS and alterations to the iron-catalyzed Fenton reaction. These interactions are particularly interesting in the context of bacterial infections. As iron is a vital nutrient for bacteria, modulating iron levels using the ECS may be able to control bacterial growth. This review aims to explore the current understanding of how the ECS affects iron homeostasis and its implications for bacterial pathogenesis. In this study, we provide an overview of both iron metabolism and the ECS, focusing on harnessing these systems to develop novel therapeutic strategies to modulate iron metabolism in bacterial infections. By elucidating these complex interactions, we hope to provide new insights into the development of novel treatments for bacterial infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntibioticsSame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207