MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411429841 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.150412

Investigating PTTPoC Communication Equipment and Smart Device Apps: A Digital Forensic Approach

2025· article· en· W4411429841 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kritarth Y. Jhala, Nilay Mistry

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital and Cyber Forensics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital forensicsComputer scienceComputer securityEmbedded systemHuman–computer interactionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today's radio communication equipment is used for more than simply analog two-way communication; newer technology includes text messaging, GPS tracking, private calls, smartphone integration, and other features.In addition, a lot of these gadgets are smartphone-integrated allowing users to connect two-way radios and smartphones via Push-To-Talk providers.The adaptability of such gadgets is increasing in the global market.However, minimal study has been conducted on the digital footprints found in modern radio communications equipment.In this study, we examine several radio communication devices and related services that digital forensic practitioners and law enforcement organizations could encounter at a crime scene or during an investigation.It focuses on the process of acquiring and analyzing digital artifacts and validating techniques through tests with sample devices and related services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicDigital and Cyber ForensicsFrench-language works237,207