MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411438887 · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103677

When evidence modeling meets knowledge distillation: Towards reliable contrast-enhanced knowledge distillation for non-contrast medical image segmentation

2025· article· en· W4411438887 on OpenAlexaff
Jianfeng Zhao, Shuo Li

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Image Analysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContrast (vision)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceSegmentationDomain knowledgeDistillationPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contrast-enhanced knowledge distillation promises to transform medical diagnostics and reveal promising approaches for tumor segmentation on non-contrast medical images. However, existing methods related to contrast-enhanced knowledge distillation still make it hard to distill reliable contrast-enhanced knowledge for tumor segmentation due to the limitations of (1) unable to quantify uncertainty information for reliable contrast-enhanced and non-contrast knowledge modeling, which leads to an over-confidence cross-domain adaptation for transferring contrast-enhanced knowledge; (2) using vision information only ignores rich semantic features in medical language, which make it hard to model complex tumor enhancement feature. In this study, we propose an evidence-guided and tumor-aware knowledge distillation (EGTA-KD) for transferring contrast-enhanced domain knowledge to non-contrast domain knowledge. Specifically, to achieve tumor-awareness by embedding semantic features from text, the tumor-aware cross-modal synchronizer (TACMS) is proposed to calculate tumor score maps for matching pixel wise image and text features. To achieve reliable cross-domain modeling for transferring contrast-enhanced knowledge, the innovative uncertainty-quantified evidence unit (UQEU) parameterizes the probability distribution within subjective logic to gather reliable evidence of contrast-enhanced knowledge while quantifying the uncertainty of prediction. Lastly, newly designed dual-level knowledge distillation (DLKD) minimizes tumor score map errors and matches evidence distribution for uncertainty-aware contrast-enhanced knowledge distillation. Extensive experiments of tumor segmentation on non-contrast medical images are performed using multi-modality medical image datasets (i.e., Brain MRI dataset, Liver MRI dataset, and Kidney CT dataset). Experimental results demonstrate the proposed EGTA-KD outperforms the other compared state-of-the-art methods, revealing its superiority of tumor segmentation on non-contrast medical images via uncertainty-aware contrast-enhanced knowledge distillation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Image AnalysisSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207