MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411446426 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3581437

Adaptive 3D M-QAM Using Cross Polarized Antenna

2025· article· en· W4411446426 on OpenAlexaff
Yousef Ali Abohamra

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuadrature amplitude modulationQAMAntenna (radio)TelecommunicationsBit error rateDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless communication is a fundamental aspect of everyday life. Modern mobile applications such as the Internet of Things (IoT), high-resolution video streaming, connected cars, smart cities, and telehealth care have a universal presence these days. The growth in these applications will continue to require higher data rates, large bandwidth, increased capacity, low latency and high throughput. As the Radio Frequency (RF) spectrum is a limited resource, considerable effort has been expended in the search for more efficient techniques for transmitting data through limited bandwidth resources. The key component of meeting this requirement is employing an efficient adaptive modulation scheme. Adaptive M-ary Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (M-QAM) techniques have been developed to deliver better Bit Error Rate (BER) performance and higher Spectral Efficiency (SE) by taking advantage of the time-varying nature of wireless fading channels. This work further enhances the adaptive M-QAM by employing an efficient Three-Dimensional (3D) adaptive modulation scheme to significantly increase the BER and SE of the wireless networks. This paper introduces a novel 3D version of adaptive M-QAM that significantly improves the BER performance and, more importantly, doubles the SE. This results in also doubling the network capacity and throughput. Simulation results show that the SE is doubled, and the gain is increased by 6 <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">dB</i> in BER versus Energy per Bit to Noise ratio <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Eb</i>/<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">No</i> curves. This study proposes that this improvement can be further enhanced by transmitting and receiving through more than two planes, using more than two cross-polarized antennas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207