Oral Findings Linked to Chronic Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background\Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as a clinical syndrome secondary to a permanent change in kidney function or structure, making it irreversible. Most patients at the onset of the disease are asymptomatic or present nonspecific symptoms, including signs and symptoms at the oral level. These manifestations, such as hyposalivation, increased calculus index, enamel defects, or changes in saliva composition, contribute to the diagnosis of this pathology and can also significantly affect the patient’s quality of life. The aim is to systematically assess the presence and relevance of oral manifestations in patients with CKD, and to identify correlations between these symptoms and clinical parameters such as glomerular filtration rate or concomitant conditions of the patient. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, and The Cochrane Library databases on 7 April 2025, using terms related to “chronic kidney disease” and “oral manifestations”. Inclusion criteria referred to observational studies published in the last ten years that reported oral symptoms in patients with CKD. The quality of cohort and case-control studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), while for cross-sectional studies, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used. Results: A total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, primarily cross-sectional in design. The most frequently reported oral manifestations included hyposalivation, increased calculus and plaque indices, enamel defects, periodontal disease, and oral candidiasis. Significant associations were identified between the duration of dialysis and severity of periodontal disease, as well as between CKD stage and taste dysfunction. Findings varied by age group and CKD stage, with children showing distinct salivary profiles and adults presenting more pronounced periodontal and mucosal conditions. Conclusions: This review highlights a clear relationship between CKD and various oral health disturbances, although more studies are needed to better understand oral–systemic interactions in CKD. What is necessary is the establishment of multidisciplinary care approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".