Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plant tissue culture has been recognized as an essential technology in plant science research. This process is widely used to regenerate and conserve phenotypically and genetically identical plant resources. The advancements in tissue culture methods have become a feasible option for the micropropagation of plants at the commercial level. The success of commercial micropropagation necessitates genetic stability among regenerated plants. Sometimes, in vitro-grown plants show genetic and epigenetic alterations due to stressful artificial culture conditions, media compositions, and explant types. As a result, it is essential to ensure genetic stability among tissue culture-derived plantlets at a very early stage. Somaclonal variations can be detected by phenotypic assessment, cytogenetic, DNA-based molecular markers, bisulfite sequencing, and RNA sequencing. This review aims to describe the causes behind somaclonal variation, the selection of somaclonal variants, and their uses in crop and plant improvement at the commercial level. This study discusses the optimization processes of undesirable genetic and epigenetic variation among micropropagated plants and their application in global horticulture, agriculture, and forestry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".