Potential Significance of Targeting Ferroptosis for Intervention of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes represents a significant global health concern, with diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) emerging as a primary cause of mortality among individuals with diabetes. Despite the prevalence of DCM, advancements in therapeutic and preventative strategies remain constrained. METHODS: Recent studies were reviewed to provide a comprehensive summary of pathogenesis and clinical treatment of DCM, effect of ferroptosis, and potential value of ferroptosis inhibitors in DCM intervention. RESULTS: A growing body of research indicates that oxidative stress, inflammatory reactions, and other factors play a role in the onset and progression of DCM. Oxidative stress within cardiomyocytes is a primary mechanism implicated in the development of DCM, whereby heightened intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) facilitate cell death via ferroptosis. Ferroptosis inhibitors hold great promise as therapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an overview of the involvement of iron homeostasis regulation, oxidative stress, and ferroptosis in DCM, and the significance of ferroptosis in the prevention and treatment of DCM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".