Direct Estimation of Forest Aboveground Biomass from UAV LiDAR and RGB Observations in Forest Stands with Various Tree Densities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada’s vast forests play a substantial role in the global carbon balance but require laborious and expensive forest inventory campaigns to monitor changes in aboveground biomass (AGB). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) or reflectance observations onboard airborne or unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) may address scalability limitations associated with traditional forest inventory but require simple forest structures or large sets of manually delineated crowns. Here, we introduce a deep learning approach for crown delineation and AGB estimation reproducible for complex forest structures without relying on hand annotations for training. Firstly, we detect treetops and delineate crowns with a LiDAR point cloud using marker-controlled watershed segmentation (MCWS). Then we train a deep learning model on annotations derived from MCWS to make crown predictions on UAV red, blue, and green (RGB) tiles. Finally, we estimate AGB metrics from tree height- and crown diameter-based allometric equations, all derived from UAV data. We validate our approach using 14 ha mixed forest stands with various experimental tree densities in Southern Ontario, Canada. Our results show that using an unsupervised LiDAR-only algorithm for tree crown delineation alongside a self-supervised RGB deep learning model trained on LiDAR-derived annotations leads to an 18% improvement in AGB estimation accuracy. In unharvested stands, the self-supervised RGB model performs well for height (adjusted R2, Ra2 = 0.79) and AGB (Ra2 = 0.80) estimation. In thinned stands, the performance of both unsupervised and self-supervised methods varied with stand density, crown clumping, canopy height variation, and species diversity. These findings suggest that MCWS can be supplemented with self-supervised deep learning to directly estimate biomass components in complex forest structures as well as atypical forest conditions where stand density and spatial patterns are manipulated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".