Compositional characteristics of proto‐porcelain wares of the Wuyishan cluster in Southeast China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The enduring mystery of the production, trade, and consumption of the prestigious proto‐porcelain wares across northern and southern China has abated in the wake of discovery of kilns for such products in the recent decades. A new cluster of such kilns recently discovered in the Wuyishan Mountain, in particular, supplies a promising candidate for provenancing those of the Western Zhou (1045‐771 BCE). To test this possibility, however, it is indispensable to investigate a priori the compositional characteristics of the products of this cluster. To this end, the authors analyzed a number of samples of proto‐porcelain wares from three sites and porcelain stone near them with ICP‐OES and SEM‐EDS. They found that the bodies of the samples are made of porcelain stone available in the vicinity. The discrepancies in the bodies and glazes across different production sites are largely derived from deliberate choices of raw materials and firing technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it