MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411461200 · doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2025.06.008

Arrhythmia substrate identification using wideband motion-corrected late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in a swine model of myocardial infarction with taped implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

2025· article· en· W4411461200 on OpenAlexafffund
Calder Sheagren, Terenz Escartin, Jaykumar Patel, Jennifer Barry, Kelvin Chow, Xiaoming Bi, María Terricabras, Graham A. Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart Rhythm O2 · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSiemens Healthineers
KeywordsMyocardial infarctionCardiologyMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingCardiac magnetic resonanceInternal medicineImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorGadoliniumNuclear magnetic resonanceNuclear medicineMaterials scienceRadiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sudden cardiac death is a leading worldwide cause of cardiac mortality and is largely related to ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with known myocardial scarring. In these patients, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduces arrhythmia-related mortality. However, curative procedures such as catheter ablation are used to homogenize regions of scar and remove structural re-entry circuits that cause VT. Objective: In this paper, we conduct a preliminary experiment comparing 2-dimensional (2D) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and 3-dimensional (3D) LGE without an ICD with wideband motion-corrected (WB-MOCO) LGE with an ICD in a cohort of infarcted Yorkshire swine. Methods: Animals were imaged after infarct with conventional 2D and 3D LGE without an ICD present and 2D WB-MOCO LGE with an ICD present. Images were analyzed to determine heterogeneous tissue corridor (HTC) count and location, which were compared with circuit exit locations determined using a 12-lead electrocardiogram. Results: We found a statistically significant increase in HTC count with WB-MOCO LGE, but no significant differences in the number of true-positive or false-positive HTCs per subject. Conclusion: WB-MOCO LGE has reduced specificity to physiologically relevant HTCs than conventional 2D or 3D LGE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeart Rhythm O2Same topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207