Applying interpretable machine learning to assess intraspecific trait divergence under landscape‐scale population differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Premise: occupying populations across two contrasting ecoregions-the Great Plains versus the North American Deserts. Methods: Recursive feature elimination was applied to functional trait data from the HeliantHOME database, followed by the application of the Boruta algorithm to detect the traits that are most predictive of ecoregion. Random forest and gradient boosting machine classifiers were then trained and validated, with results visualized using accumulated local effects plots. Results: The most ecoregion-predictive functional traits span categories of leaf economics, plant architecture, reproductive phenology, and floral and seed morphology. Relative to the Great Plains, genotypes from the North American Deserts exhibit shorter stature, fewer leaves, higher leaf nitrogen content, and longer average length of phyllaries. Discussion: This approach readily identifies traits predictive of ecoregion origin, and thus the functional traits most likely to be responsible for contrasting ecological strategies across the landscape. This type of approach can be used to parse large plant trait datasets in a wide range of contexts, including explicitly testing the applicability of interspecific paradigms at intraspecific scales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".