MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411463714 · doi:10.53762/7k6y7m59

10.53762/7k6y7m59

2000· article· en· W4411463714 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ayesha Akram, Muhammad Abu Bakar, Nadia Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorRulerBlasphemyPunishment (psychology)ShariaPower (physics)LawPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophyIslamTheologyPsychologyPhysicsComputer scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the concept of Protection of honor of the Prophet peace be upon him in the light of invaluable book “ al- Al-Shifāʻ bi Taʻrīf Huqūq al-Mustafā penned by the renowned scholar Qādī ʻIyād. From the principle stated by Qazi Ayaz, the article finds that when blood of a person is declared permissible in a blasphemy case, all the requirements of research and investigation should be fulfilled before the death penalty. It is very important to have reliable, clear and strong testimony to confirm the insolence and blasphemy of the Messenger of Allah. The accused will be released in case of insufficient evidence. The power of punishment rests only with the system and the ruler, and the ruler will punish when the evidence of the crime is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9810.933

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207