MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411465739 · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139000

Size and concentration characterization of microplastic particles in aqueous samples using sensitivity-enhanced coupled planar microwave resonators

2025· article· en· W4411465739 on OpenAlexafffund
Maziar ShafieiDarabi, Zahra Abbasi, Carolyn L. Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hazardous Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsMicrowavePlanarAqueous solutionCharacterization (materials science)ResonatorSensitivity (control systems)Materials scienceChemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryElectronic engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a novel microwave sensing platform for real-time monitoring of microplastic (MP) particle size and concentration in liquid media, with enhanced sensitivity achieved through the integration of an interdigital capacitor with the traditional split-ring resonator structure. A disposable sample holder (< $1) allows multiplex testing without cross-contamination. The sensing principle relies on electromagnetic interactions between suspended MP particles in liquid media and the microwave resonator, which is coupled with a planar microwave reader. Initially, MP particles are homogeneously distributed, but as they settle over time, they result in a dynamic shift in the resonance frequency that depends on MP size. The resonance frequency shift plateaus once all particles have settled, providing a measure of MP concentration. The sensor was designed and optimized using HFSS simulations and tested at three temperatures (10-30°C) in four host media (DI water, tap water, NaCl and urea solutions). Its performance was evaluated by detecting MPs of varied sizes (20, 70, and 275 µm) at concentrations of 100k, 1,000k, and 10,000k particles/L. The average detection slopes across the tested concentrations were 8.64 kHz for 20 µm, 38.52 kHz for 70 µm, and 110.78 kHz for 275 µm. This novel sensor demonstrates strong potential for on-site MP size and concentration monitoring, offering a cost-effective solution for environmental applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hazardous MaterialsSame topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207