MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411467129 · doi:10.1007/s40429-025-00671-6

Procurement Pathways of Illegal Substances in Germany: A Systematic Review with Implications for Prevention, Harm Reduction, and Drug Policy

2025· review· en· W4411467129 on OpenAlex
Lena Hammerl, Theresa Halms, Andrea Rabenstein, Tobias Rüther, Alkomiet Hasan, Marcus Gertzen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Addiction Reports · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessProcurementSocial mediaHarm reductionPublic relationsPolitical scienceMedicineMarketingPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose of Review Illegal substance use is a global issue with significant health, social, and economic consequences, and Germany is no exception. This systematic review examines drug procurement methods in Germany, focusing on their mechanisms, market dynamics, and associated health risks, aiming to synthesize existing research on drug acquisition methods. By identifying key trends and gaps in the literature, this review provides a foundation for future research, and includes discussions of harm reduction strategies and policy interventions. Recent Findings A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science identified papers published in English or German between January 2009 and May 2024. Eleven studies (six qualitative, five quantitative) met the inclusion criteria, assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program and Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Tool. Key findings revealed diverse procurement routes: cryptomarkets, street-based markets, self-cultivation, and social supply networks. Cryptomarkets, virtual marketplaces accessed via the Darknet and using cryptocurrency for transactions, ensure buyer anonymity and offer global reach with trust built through reviews and secure transactions. In contrast, street markets rely on interpersonal trust and geographic proximity. Social networks facilitate non-commercial sharing, especially of cannabis. Despite their potential, the role of social media in drug distribution remains underexplored in Germany. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted market adaptability, with cryptomarkets navigating disruptions more effectively than street-based markets. Drug quality varied, with cryptomarkets often offering higher purity due to reputation-based incentives. Summary The procurement of illegal substances in Germany reflects a dynamic interplay of online and offline mechanisms. While cryptomarkets offer anonymity and quality control advantages, street markets continue to serve as vital supply points. Social supply networks and self-cultivation further diversify procurement routes. Despite these insights, the review identified significant research gaps, including gender-specific dynamics, the impact of cannabis legalization, and differences in drug quality across channels. This study underscores the complexity of Germany’s drug markets, emphasizing the need for targeted research to address these gaps. Expanding knowledge in this area could inform harm reduction strategies and policy interventions tailored to Germany’s unique drug procurement landscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it