Chromophoric dissolved organic matter in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Canada, and its association to lake acid sensitivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) represents a broad class of organic compounds that absorb visible and ultraviolet light and can influence numerous aquatic system functions. The Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR) in Alberta, Canada, contains an abundance of boreal lakes suspected to possess high quantities of CDOM. However, CDOM within these lakes has never been investigated; moreover, the potential impact of shifting acid-base chemistry (possibly linked to industrial acid deposition) is largely unknown. This study characterized CDOM within fifty acid sensitive lakes in the AOSR using fluorescence spectroscopy and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) to ultimately identify the sources and processes acting on organic matter, and to explore the potential link between CDOM and lake water acid-base chemistry. Four fluorescent components including two humic-like (C1, C2) and two amino acid-like (C3, C4) compounds were identified through PARAFAC. Multivariate analysis indicated that C1 and C2 likely originated from surrounding peatlands and were associated with lake water colour and dissolved organic carbon, respectively (Spearman correlation coefficient [R S ] > 0.7). Strong associations with metals and variables reflective of irradiation (R S > 0.65) suggested that the comparatively aromatic C1 formed CDOM–metal complexes that were vulnerable to photodegradation. Both C3 and C4 remained largely unresolved due to limited associations with the available data; however, C3 spectra were similar to anthropogenic fluorescent species reported in the literature. Weak associations were observed between CDOM variables and pH and alkalinity, providing limited evidence to suggest that CDOM and acid-base chemistry shared a direct relationship within AOSR lakes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".