MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411472578 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104683

Learning dual context aware POI representations for geographic mapping

2025· article· en· W4411472578 on OpenAlexaff
Quan Qin, Tinghua Ai, Shishuo Xu, Yan Zhang, Weiming Huang, Mingyi Du, Songnian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)GeographyContext (archaeology)CartographyData scienceComputer scienceArchaeologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by artificial intelligence technologies, geospatial representation learning has become a new trend to better understand urban systems. Points of Interest (POI), as the current mainstream data in urban studies, plays an important role in these methods to discover urban characteristics. Existing studies on POI representation learning focus on spatial and type information, but overlook heterogeneous semantic interaction between POIs as well as hierarchical associations among types. To tackle these two problems, we propose a novel approach, called POI Dual Context Aware Neural Network (DCA) for learning POI representations by jointly embedding both spatial context and type context. For the spatial context of POIs, we introduce a distance decay effect constrained graph attention network as an encoder of DCA, which takes the heterogeneous semantic interaction and spatial proximity of POIs into account. For the type context of POIs, we propose a type hierarchical aggregation neural network architecture for DCA, and design a type infomax optimization objective following contrastive learning mechanism. The superiority of DCA is demonstrated in three geographic mapping tasks, including urban function mapping, region popularity mapping, and housing price mapping. This study provides a new insight to mine deep information from POIs, contributing to a better understanding of urban systems. The source code is released at http://github.com/quan-qin/DCA .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207