MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411473118 · doi:10.70748/ba.7.2011.318

Eloy Linares Málaga: pionero del arte rupestre

2011· article· en· W4411473118 on OpenAlex
Robert G. Bednarik

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín APAR. · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Geological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationGazeRock artHumanitiesArtHistoryVisual artsArt historySociologyPsychologyArchaeologyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fi rst time I met Professor Eloy Linares Málaga was in Vancouver, at the 11th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences in August 1983. There were three small rock art sessions, only one of which included formal paper presentations (seven papers in all, in an event featuring well over a thousand presentations) and he had been invited to attend. He seemed to be making a point of wanting to talk to every one of the rock art specialists present — not that there were so many, barely more than a dozen. Most of them were Americans and I noticed how they nodded politely as their gaze wandered around to look for alternative conversation partners, preferably someone wanting to listen to their own breathtaking stories. Or perhaps they regarded the Peruvian rock art as very marginal to their own interests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.076 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it