A Study on the Practice of Integrating Ideological and Political Education into College English in the “Internet Plus” Era: A TPACK-Based Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of Internet technologies and the growing emphasis on ideological and political education (IPE) in higher education, College English teaching is facing both challenges and new opportunities. This study takes the lesson “The Shadowland of Dreams” from the College English Reading and Writing course as a case study to explore how IPE can be effectively integrated into College English instruction within the context of the “Internet Plus” era. Grounded in the TPACK (Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge) framework, the study examines existing problems and limitations in the current implementation of IPE and proposes practical pathways for integrating information technology with value-oriented education. It also reflects on innovative approaches to the teaching model, teaching materials, and evaluation mechanisms. This study finds that the Internet-based platforms in the “Internet Plus” era empower IPE in College English teaching, not only facilitating reforms in teaching models but also providing new perspectives and practical strategies for updating course content and constructing a more comprehensive evaluation system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".