Design and Evaluation of a Soft Robotic Actuator with Non-Intrusive Vision-Based Bending Measurement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the design and evaluation of a novel soft pneumatic actuator featuring two independent bending chambers, enabling independent joint actuation and localization for rehabilitation purposes. The actuator's dual-chamber configuration provides flexibility for applications requiring customized bending profiles. To measure the bending angle of the finger joints in real time, a camera-based system is employed, utilizing a deep learning detection model to localize the joints and estimate their bending angles. This approach provides a non-intrusive, sensor-free alternative to hardware-based measurement methods, reducing complexity and wiring typically associated with wearable devices. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed actuator in achieving bending angles of 105 degrees for the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint and 95 degrees for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, as well as a gripping force of 9.3 N. The vision system also captures bending angles with a precision of 98%, indicating potential applications in fields such as rehabilitation and human-robot interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".