MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411488713 · doi:10.1049/ote2.70006

Design of FBG‐Based Sensing System for Meat Quality Assessment and Steak Cooking Optimisation

2025· article· en· W4411488713 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Optoelectronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsOptiwave Systems (Canada)
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingRaw materialRaw meatWavelengthSensitivity (control systems)Materials scienceEnvironmental scienceFood scienceOptoelectronicsChemistryElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Water presence in raw meat not only degrades its quality by diluting the natural flavours, but also increases the risk of bacterial growth, altering texture, and juiciness which ultimately affects the quality of end products. Therefore, quality assessment of raw meat in markets as well as in eateries is important to ensure the consumer's safety and satisfaction. In this paper, we propose a nondestructive technique to detect water presence in raw meat and steak cooking temperature optimisation using a fibre Bragg grating (FBG) temperature sensor inserted into the piece of raw meat. The contribution of this paper is twofold: First, the water presence in the piece of raw meat is detected by analysing the shift in Bragg wavelength corresponding to time‐dependent gradual decrease in temperature of heated probe of FBG sensor due to convective heat transfer from probe to meat. Secondly, the optimum cooking temperature of a particular type of steak is achieved after quality assessment of meat by analysing the shift in Bragg wavelength corresponding to time‐dependent gradual increase in probe temperature due to convective heat transfer from meat to probe. The results show that the proposed sensing system can complete the error‐free detection of water in 250 g piece of raw meat within 30 s for water contents of 50, 75, and 100 g which account for 20%, 30%, and 40% of the net weight of meat, respectively. Moreover, the simulated and experimental values of temperature sensitivity (TS) of FBG sensor used in this work are around 13 and 10 pm/°C, respectively. The proof of the concept of a smart restaurant based upon the proposed work is also discussed. This study provides a nondestructive, simple, and fast solution for detection of water in raw meat and achieving the optimum cooking temperature for different types of steaks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it