MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411492141 · doi:10.1128/mbio.01393-25

<i>Legionella pneumophila</i> type II secretome reveals a polysaccharide deacetylase that impacts intracellular infection, biofilm formation, and resistance to polymyxin- and serum-mediated killing

2025· article· en· W4411492141 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Carlton O. Adams, Jackson A. Campbell, Bo Zhang, Leanne Cleaver, Sarah B. Bier, Joshua Mayoral, Richard C. White, James A. Garnett, Nicholas P. Cianciotto

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLegionella and Acanthamoeba research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesMedical Research Council CanadaBritish Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
KeywordsLegionella pneumophilaMicrobiologyPeptidoglycanBiofilmMutantLegionellaPolymyxinBiologyPolymyxin BLipopolysaccharideSecretionBiochemistryChemistryBacteriaCell wall

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Prior analyses suggested that the type II secretion system (T2SS) of Legionella pneumophila secretes ≥47 proteins beyond its 26 known substrates. Upon examination of mutants of wild-type strain 130b that lack those exoproteins most conserved across the Legionella genus, we discovered that protein “06635” majorly promotes L. pneumophila replication within amoebae. Immunoblotting, proteomics, and whole-cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) confirmed that 06635 exists in culture supernatants and on the bacterial outer surface and does so in a T2SS-dependent manner. Bioinformatic analyses identified 06635 as a novel member of the carbohydrate esterase family 4, whose members deacetylate bacterial surface polysaccharides, peptidoglycan, chitins, and/or xylans. Given 06635’s T2SS-dependent secretion, low-level amino acid similarity to known peptidoglycan deacetylases, and the unaltered lysozyme resistance of a 06635 mutant, we pursued the hypothesis that 06635 deacetylates a polysaccharide on L. pneumophila ’s surface. Supporting this, the 06635 mutant exhibited increased binding to both wheat germ agglutinin (i.e., more surface N -acetylglucosamine) and antibodies that recognize acetylated lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of isolated mutant vs wild-type LPS confirmed that 06635 promotes LPS deacetylation. Thus, we designated 06635 as PdaA, for p olysaccharide d e a cetylase A . Compatible with its altered surface, the pdaA mutant showed greater autoaggregation, increased biofilm formation, and heightened sensitivity to both polymyxin and human serum. Thus, we hypothesize that, following its secretion via the T2SS, PdaA deacetylates LPS, and perhaps other moieties, impacting many significant processes. While defining PdaA, we identified many more putative substrates of the L. pneumophila T2SS, bringing the size of the T2SS output to approximately 120. IMPORTANCE Legionella pneumophila is the principal cause of Legionnaires’ disease, an increasingly common form of pneumonia. Although prior work demonstrated that the bacterium utilizes its type II protein secretion system (T2SS) to survive in aquatic environments and to cause lung infection, the full scope and impact of this Legionella secretion system is still relatively underappreciated. By utilizing an expanded proteomic approach and testing newly made mutants in a wide range of assays, we have determined that the L. pneumophila type II secretome encompasses approximately 120 proteins, and among these proteins is a novel polysaccharide deacetylase (PdaA) that modulates the L. pneumophila surface and lipopolysaccharide, impacting intracellular infection, biofilm formation, and resistance to both antibiotics and human serum. Moreover, since T2SSs and homologs of PdaA were found in many other bacteria, our findings should also have implications for understanding other infectious diseases and environmental processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicLegionella and Acanthamoeba researchFrench-language works237,207