Acute-Onset Cognitive Impairment Following COVID-19 Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: A recently published systematic review studying the link between COVID-19 and new-onset dementia (NOD) concluded that COVID-19 infection is likely to be a risk factor for developing NOD in older adults at 12 months, but no increased risk was noted at 3 or 6 month post-infection. We present a case of an elderly gentleman ‘X’ with no prior history of any cognitive deficit, who developed behavioural problems and cognitive decline within 6 weeks of a COVID-19 infection. Methods: X is a 70-year-old gentleman with no previous history of psychiatric illness prior to March 2020, when he contracted COVID-19. Within 6 weeks of a positive swab, there was an acute change in his behaviour and cognition, wherein he was noted to be more talkative, disinhibited, presenting with grandiose ideas, sleeping very little at night and displaying intermittent episodes of confusion. X had never complained of problems with his memory and the family had never previously raised concerns about the same. However, cognitive testing carried out at 3 months post-infection revealed a significant decline in cognitive ability (Montreal Cognitive Assessment 17/30). X was referred to the neurology team, which carried out a battery of tests including MRI scans, DAT scan, cerebrospinal fluid analysis and antibody screens. These largely came back negative and no organic cause could be determined for X’s presentation. However, the screen for Neurofilament Light Polypeptide (NFL) was positive, which was reported to possibly indicate damage following COVID-19 infection. NFL is known to have links with Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Cognitive tests repeated in 2024 have returned a MOCA score of 16/30, indicating that X’s cognitive impairment continues to persist. Results: A retrospective cohort study by Taquet et al. which looked at the association between COVID-19 infection and psychiatric disorder found that there was a two to three times increased risk of dementia after COVID-19 infection. A subsequent larger study by the same authors published in Lancet Psychiatry which looked at 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes following COVID-19 infection confirmed the link between COVID-19 and risk of NOD. The presentation of our patient X is consistent with this finding. Conclusion: Our case study highlights the increased risk of cognitive decline and NOD following COVID-19 infection in older adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".