MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411494290 · doi:10.1177/2050313x251352130

Successful treatment of refractory pyoderma gangrenosum with risankizumab in a 57-year-old patient: A case report

2025· article· en· W4411494290 on OpenAlexaff
Damy Horth, Nora Assouyat, Isabelle Auger

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Medical Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyoderma gangrenosumMedicineDapsoneDermatologyInflammatory bowel diseaseRheumatoid arthritisEtanerceptSkin biopsyIsotretinoinSurgeryRefractory (planetary science)TacrolimusBiopsyInternal medicineDiseaseAcne

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pyoderma gangrenosum is a neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by rapidly progressing inflammatory skin lesions. It is often associated with underlying systemic conditions, such as inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Patients typically present with erythematous papules and pustules that rapidly evolve into painful ulcers, most commonly affecting the lower extremities. In this case report, we describe a 57-year-old female patient with multirefractory pyoderma gangrenosum localized to the lower left leg. The diagnosis was confirmed based on clinical and histopathological features, with a skin biopsy showing compatible findings. Initial treatments, including topical therapies (high-potency steroids, dapsone, and calcineurin inhibitors) and conventional systemic immunosuppressive therapies (corticosteroids and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors), failed to produce significant improvement. However, treatment with risankizumab, an interleukin-23 inhibitor, resulted in substantial ulcer healing over a few weeks and ultimately led to complete resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open Medical Case ReportsSame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory DisordersFrench-language works237,207