Cardiac Medication Use in ACTION for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study seeks to understand cardiac medication use in a large cohort of males with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) followed prospectively with focus on current practices and adherence to consensus directed medical therapy (CDMT). DMD patients have been enrolled in the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) Dystrophinopathy Registry since 2021. Cardiac medication use was analyzed at enrollment and most recent follow-up. CDMT was defined as concurrent use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) /angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) plus beta-blocker (BB) plus mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Two hundred sixty-five males with DMD (median age 17.5 (IQR 14.5-21.5) years) were prospectively followed; median follow-up was 11.5 (IQR 6.2-15.6) months. At most recent follow-up, 153 patients (57.7%) had decreased LV systolic function, 67 (25.3% of the cohort) had moderate or severe dysfunction. For patients with moderate or severe dysfunction, CDMT was used for 49/67 (73.1%) at most recent follow-up, similar to 36/51 (70.6%) at enrollment (p = 0.92). Target doses of CDMT were achieved for 27% of males on ACEi/ARB/ARNI, 28% on BB, and 23% on MRA. Initial analysis of a prospective registry of males with DMD showed that ~ 30% of patients with moderate or severe LV dysfunction were not on CDMT at most recent follow-up and the majority did not reach target dosing. Further understanding regarding the optimal combination of cardiac medications for DMD cardiomyopathy is needed, as is a better understanding of the barriers to CDMT optimization given increasing cardiac causes of death for DMD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".