MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411498593 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x2550109x

On the Pauli–Schrödinger coupling to the Galilean gravity

2025· article· en· W4411498593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCrystallography and Radiation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Quantum Research Center
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsPhysicsGalileanSchrödinger's catMinimal couplingCoupling (piping)Mathematical physicsQuantum electrodynamicsPauli exclusion principleQuantum gravityClassical mechanicsTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the coupling between spinor fields and nonrelativistic gravity in the context of Galilean covariance. By formulating nonrelativistic physics in a five-dimensional manifold, gravitational interaction is described geometrically through the teleparallel version of Galilean gravity. This covariant framework allows the Pauli–Schrödinger field to be consistently coupled to Newtonian gravitation, following a procedure analogous to minimal coupling in relativistic theories. The result is a geometrically motivated and unified description of spinor fields under nonrelativistic gravitational interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it