MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411498593 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x2550109x

On the Pauli–Schrödinger coupling to the Galilean gravity

2025· article· en· W4411498593 on OpenAlexaff
R. G. G. Amorim, A. F. Santos, K. Vaz, S. C. Ulhoa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCrystallography and Radiation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Quantum Research Center
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsPhysicsGalileanSchrödinger's catMinimal couplingCoupling (piping)Mathematical physicsQuantum electrodynamicsPauli exclusion principleQuantum gravityClassical mechanicsTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the coupling between spinor fields and nonrelativistic gravity in the context of Galilean covariance. By formulating nonrelativistic physics in a five-dimensional manifold, gravitational interaction is described geometrically through the teleparallel version of Galilean gravity. This covariant framework allows the Pauli–Schrödinger field to be consistently coupled to Newtonian gravitation, following a procedure analogous to minimal coupling in relativistic theories. The result is a geometrically motivated and unified description of spinor fields under nonrelativistic gravitational interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicCrystallography and Radiation PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207