MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411500482 · doi:10.1177/19417381251343083

Return to Sport After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4411500482 on OpenAlexaff
Aanya Singh, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Danielle Dagher, Ujash Sheth, Moin Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueSports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreImpactMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)Physical therapyReturn to sportArthroplastyVisual analogue scaleMEDLINESystematic reviewData extractionSurgeryRehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs) have become significantly more common in recent decades, and shoulder arthroplasties are increasingly performed on younger, active patient populations. However, the body of evidence evaluating return to sport after RSA is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rates of return to sport after RSA as well as patient-reported outcomes for pain and function. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL identified studies from inception through October 10, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Studies evaluating return to sport after RSA in adult patients (>18 years) were included. Reviews, meta-analyses, non-English language, and studies that did not report return to sport data were excluded. Outcomes included rates of return to sport at any level, and at the same level or higher, as well as patient-reported outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: A descriptive analysis of the included studies was performed. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies (3092 patients) were included. Mean patient age was 72.5 years, and most (58.8%) were female. The mean rate of return to sport at any level was 85.1% (95% CI, 84.6-85.6). The mean rate of return to the same level or higher was 69.5% (95% CI, 67.6-71.4). The mean decrease in visual analog scale pain score was 1.97, whereas ASES and CMS scores increased 64.0 and 35.5 points, respectively. All changes in patient-reported outcomes exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSION: This review demonstrates a high rate of return to sport after RSA, with a substantial portion of patients maintaining or exceeding their preoperative activity level. Clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function were also observed. Limitations include the predominantly retrospective study design and the high mean patient age, necessitating further research on generalizability and long-term outcomes, particularly in younger populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.007
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSports Health A Multidisciplinary ApproachSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207