Sustainable Live Sound Monitoring and Classification System Enabled by a Triboelectric Nanogenerator and Machine Learning Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing demand for sustainable, real‐time audio processing drives innovations in sound classification and energy harvesting. Traditional sound monitoring systems often struggle with scalability, energy efficiency, and adaptability, particularly in remote or resource‐limited environments. The expansion of IoT applications intensifies power demands in widely distributed wireless sensor networks, highlighting the need for sustainable solutions. Moreover, the volume of data generated by these sensors frequently exceeds the capacity for efficient human analysis, necessitating the integration of machine learning and deep learning techniques. These methods must be optimized for fine‐tuning with minimal data from new sensors, enabling efficient and accurate sound classification without extensive retraining. This paper presents a Triboelectric Nanogenerator (TENG)‐based microphone that addresses energy consumption and data processing challenges by integrating advanced materials with sound classification systems. The proposed device uses polyimine/graphite polypropylene (PI/GP) coated paper to capture sound and harvest energy from ambient noise. It delivers an output power of 25.67 μW at 94 dB, powering a wireless transmission circuit while achieving high acoustic sensitivity and a frequency response of up to 20 kHz. Performance evaluations show 92.7% classification accuracy in simulated live environments and a processing time of 0.342 s for 5‐s audio clips using the MobileNet V1 model. Pre‐trained models fine‐tuned with minimal data from the TENG microphone enable efficient sound classification without extensive retraining. This innovation offers a sustainable alternative to conventional microphones, supporting self‐powered, real‐time monitoring systems with wireless data transmission and energy storage capabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".