MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411502036 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1489905

In-vitro transcriptomic profiling of indigenous Gaddi vis-à-vis exotic Labrador dogs: insights from systems biology

2025· article· en· W4411502036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaswinder Kaur, Bilawal Singh, R. S. Sethi, Deepti Narang, Simarjeet Kaur, Chandra Sekhar Mukhopadhyay

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGuru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences UniversityDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsBiologyIndigenousProfiling (computer programming)TranscriptomeZoologyEcologyGeneticsGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The domestication of dogs is regarded as an evolutionary adaptation influenced by artificial selective pressures, leading to the fruition of diverse canine breeds across regions. Indigenous breeds, developed in tandem with local environments, display unique conformations and disease resistance, yet many remain understudied at the molecular level. The Gaddi dog, originating in the northern parts of India and used by local tribes for livestock guarding, exemplifies such a breed with potential for transcriptomic research. Despite its vital role, it remains unrecognized by the National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources (NBAGR). This study addresses the gaps in understanding the genetics and immune responses of Indigenous breeds, emphasizing their importance as holders of unique genetic heritage. This study explores the molecular profiles of Indigenous Gaddi dogs and exotic Labrador retrievers, focusing on their immune responses to TLR ligand-induced infections. Methods: < 0.05) was conducted to identify enriched pathways in each breed. Results: The analysis revealed that Labrador dogs had more DEGs across all treatment groups than Gaddi dogs. The enriched pathways in Labradors included Th1, Th2, Th17 cell differentiation, and T-cell receptor signaling. In contrast, Gaddi dogs significantly enriched 'Wnt' signaling, T cell activation, and immune regulation pathways. The differential expression (DE) analysis of miRNA-Seq results indicated that Labradors had more DE miRNAs (with expression levels of the original level >1.5 and <-1.5), such as miR-204, miR-206, miR-106a, miR-132, miR-335, and miR-676, which help regulate inflammation, autophagy, and immune responses. Gaddi dogs had unique miRNAs (miR-551 and miR-1249) associated with tumor suppression and inflammation. Discussion: The study highlights distinct immunological profiles between Labrador and Gaddi dogs, with no shared genes responding to TLR-ligand stimulation. The functional enrichment of miRNA targets demonstrated consistent regulatory patterns at both the mRNA and miRNA levels. These findings emphasize the importance of preserving the genetic diversity of indigenous Gaddi dogs and utilizing advanced sequencing techniques to explore immunological diversity for disease resistance and the selection of breeding individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207