Efficient output power configuration in a <i>K</i> -band power amplifier using a split-gate layout
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A multi-finger radio frequency (RF) transistor has been divided into multiple gate sections which can be biased independently. This provides a system designer the ability to dynamically reconfigure the output power and power gain of the device while maintaining good power efficiency and without changing the input drive power. By selectively switching the gate biases below pinch-off to effectively reduce the device’s active periphery, the maximum current of the device can be tuned to “follow” a reduced drain bias voltage, so that the optimum impedance at lower power remains similar to the one at full power, and a fixed matching network can be used to accommodate all power modes. The concept has been tested in a large signal load–pull characterization campaign on a test cell and implemented in a K -band power amplifier (PA) prototype. Measurements on the PA confirm the effectiveness of the method, achieving 30% efficiency at around 4.8–4.9 dB of output power tunability when maintaining a constant input power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".