Promoting husbands’ participation in birth preparedness and complication readiness in The Gambia: Implications for gender transformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assessed the gender-transformative implications of a training aimed at transforming gender norms and promoting husbands' involvement in birth preparedness and complication readiness in The Gambia. The study used an observational quantitative evaluation design, beginning with a pre-training assessment of 100 husbands and a post-training assessment of 96 husbands who participated in the training. It also incorporated a qualitative component comprising 12 interviews with the pregnant wives of husbands who participated in the training. The results indicated that husbands reported an increased understanding of pregnancy and childbirth due to the training. As a result, 73% reported accompanying their wives for skilled birth attendance and 60% reported saving money for potential delivery-related complications. Pregnant women have also reported improved communication with their husbands. However, sustaining these changes may require broader socioeconomic considerations. These insights, along with observations and reflections from training sessions, provide valuable lessons for organizations implementing similar programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".