Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Compared to Other Evidence-Based Mental Health Interventions in Children and Adolescents with Symptoms of Childhood Adversities: A Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: To assess the relative efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) compared to other proven therapies in improving mental health for children and adolescents affected by childhood trauma. Methodology: As part of the scoping review, a structured literature search of PubMed, Medline (EBSCO), PsychAPA, CINAHL, and Google Scholar identified studies published from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024, on evidence-based mental health interventions for minors experiencing trauma. English-language studies on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or related interventions, either standalone or integrated, were included. Duplicates were removed, and references were reviewed for completeness. Data extracted included author, year, intervention type, therapy level, age group, and summarized findings. Eligible publication types were research articles, peer-reviewed articles, and systematically curated reviews. Results: The review synthesized findings from 26 studies published between 2022 and 2024, concentrating on therapeutic interventions for children and adolescents who have experienced adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) was identified as the most efficacious intervention, demonstrating robust effectiveness in alleviating symptoms of PTSD, anxiety, and depression across a range of clinical settings. The reviewed studies utilized diverse methodological approaches and predominantly focused on PTSD, anxiety, and depressive disorders, with a subset addressing substance use disorders, bereavement, and interpersonal functioning. Notably, the review highlighted significant gaps in the literature regarding the exploration of broader psychological outcomes and the efficacy of interventions beyond TF-CBT. Conclusion: Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) stands out as the most effective treatment for enhancing mental health in children and adolescents experiencing trauma-related symptoms. Modifications of CBT and combined approaches, such as psychoeducation and family-oriented strategies, also play a significant role in diminishing post-traumatic stress symptoms and boosting resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".