The future of biomarkers for vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID): proceedings of the 2025 annual workshop of the Albert research institute for white matter and cognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advances in biomarkers and pathophysiology of vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) are expected to bring greater mechanistic insights, more targeted treatments, and potentially disease-modifying therapies. The 2025 Annual Workshop of the Albert Research Institute for White Matter and Cognition, sponsored by the Leo and Anne Albert Charitable Trust since 2015, focused on novel biomarkers for VCID. The meeting highlighted the complexity of dementia, emphasizing that the majority of cases involve multiple brain pathologies, with vascular pathology typically present. Potential novel approaches to diagnosis of disease processes and progression that may result in VCID included measures of microglial senescence and retinal changes, as well as artificial intelligence (AI) integration of multimodal datasets. Proteomic studies identified plasma proteins associated with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL; a rare genetic disorder affecting brain vessels) and age-related vascular pathology that suggested potential therapeutic targets. Blood-based microglial and brain-derived extracellular vesicles are promising tools for early detection of brain inflammation and other changes that have been associated with cognitive decline. Imaging measures of blood perfusion, oxygen extraction, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow were discussed as potential VCID biomarkers, in part because of correlations with classic pathological Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers. MRI-visible perivascular spaces, which may be a novel imaging biomarker of sleep-driven glymphatic waste clearance dysfunction, are associated with vascular risk factors, lower cognitive function, and various brain pathologies including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). People with Down syndrome are at high risk for dementia. Individuals with Down syndrome who develop dementia almost universally experience mixed brain pathologies, with AD pathology and cerebrovascular pathology being the most common. This follows the pattern in the general population where mixed pathologies are also predominant in the brains of people clinically diagnosed with dementia, including AD dementia. Intimate partner violence-related brain injury, hypertension's impact on dementia risk, and the promise of remote ischemic conditioning for treating VCID were additional themes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.033 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".